Is filing a UCC commercial lien a good way to enforce rights?

What are commercial liens?

The term "commercial lien", or just "lien", loosely refers to the filing of a UCC-1 financing statement under the laws of UCC Article 9 in a state registry as notice of an interest in some collateral. You might be familiar with such liens if you've ever financed a car or other property. The financing statement lists the name of the secured party and debtor and includes a description of the collateral, or simply refers to an object directly by serial number or other identifier, such as the Vehicle Identification Number found on most automobiles.

The filing of the financing statement does not, by itself, establish a valid, enforceable lien, but is merely a reference that indicates there might be a possible valid lien. The actual legal right to enforce a lien arises from a contract called a security agreement between the secured party and the debtor. A security agreement must be consensual, in writing, the collateral should be listed, the intent of the debtor to grant a security interest should be clear, and it must be signed by the debtor pursuant to the statute of frauds established by UCC 9-203(b)(3)(A) and the definition of "authenticate" in 9-102(a)(7).

Popularity with sovereign citizens

Once filed, whether there's a valid security agreement behind it or not, a financing statement serves as a warning to the public and potential creditors that there may be money or property owed by a debtor. This is likely to seriously affect the debtor's ability to obtain credit, especially when it appears a significant value is owed.

Unfortunately, in the interest of expedient commerce, the process is open to abuse. The legitimacy of a security agreement is not verified by state UCC offices before a financing statement is allowed to be filed. As a result, these instruments have become popular with sovereign-citizen types who use them to try to get revenge or obtain compensation for perceived trespasses against them.

The typical abusive process

To lend legitimacy, the would-be sovereign typically sends a series of letters by certified or registered mail outlining the perceived breach of their rights and giving the target an opportunity to pay an arbitrary amount as compensation. They might do something like this, for example:

  • Notice of fault
  • Second notice
  • Default
  • Invoice
  • Lien (Financing Statement)

Paper terrorism

Abusing UCC-1 financing statements is often labeled paper terrorism. As we've covered, it's a relatively easy way to cause significant frustration and harm to a party. To remove a false filing the debtor must bring a lawsuit against the secured party claiming there is no valid security agreement. Once the court sees the debtor did not explicitly grant a security interest in writing the court will order that the financing statement be discharged, and may further order costs and damages be paid to the victim. While straightforward, this is not always easy to accomplish as it can require significant expense and time to achieve. Furthermore, many people who abuse the system do so because they are broke, desperate and have nothing to lose, so it may not be possible to actually collect on any award for costs or damages.

Laws against false liens, and punishments

Georgia was one of the first states to enact a law to combat the scourge of false liens with a statute that mandated 1 to 10 years in jail and up to a $10,000 fine for each false lien against a public official. This was later extended to all persons. Various other states have laws to help combat fraudulent liens. Federal laws are also available, such as 18 USC § 1521 and 18 USC § 287.

A number of people have been criminally charged and sentenced for filing false liens:

  • Cherron Marie Phillips – 7 years jail (Memorandum)
  • Tyrone Eugene Jordan – 10 years jail (Docket)
  • Donna M. Kozak – 3 years jail (Judgment)
  • Randall David Due – 10 years jail (Judgment)
  • David Carroll Stephenson – 10 years jail (Judgment)
  • … and many more

Conclusion

Playing with commercial liens can have serious consequences. Unless you know what you're doing and have a legitimate security agreement signed by the debtor you should avoid filing UCC-1 financing statements.

What do you think?

  • Alex R.K.

    Those Sovereign Citizens have it all wrong about the UCC. They think that it's a replacement of the Constitution that, along with the abandonment of the gold standard, turned the U.S. into a corporate-owned nation where the people are "enslaved" through anything that those Sovereign bozos believe would entail an implicit contract, such as birth certificates, vehicle registrations, insurance cards, those kinds of things.

    Fact is, the UCC is a subset of law relating to commerce, and is COMPLETELY uninvolved with civil or criminal law against individuals.

    Now, I never registered to be a voter, because one may never know who's honest or who's an ambitious and corrupt scumbag. Now, I may not have much faith in the U.S. government at large, but it's no reason for me to buy into any of the BS that the self-proclaimed legal "gurus" propagate throughout the Internet.

  • WDE

    stop trying to scare people from using liens.. they are a legitimate tool when you are owed something.

    • pseudolaw.com

      The correct way to enforce a bill, contract, etc. is to file a lawsuit, get a judgment, and use court orders to seize income and assets. Liens are typically for collateralized obligations and, as stated in the article, require a security agreement (contract) signed by the debtor. Seizing an alleged debtor's property without a court order or valid security agreement is contrary to law. What makes you think otherwise?

      • Alex R.K.

        @pseudolaw:disqus Hopefully, this chap isn't a sovereign citizen like certain other people on the internet that commented here on your site to try and discredit you.

      • Lannette

        Pursuant to the Statue of Frauds, I have learned that certain types of contracts must be in writing to be enforced. However, promissory estoppel which is what I am alleging in my lawsuit against the fraudulent seller, says we had/have an enforceable contract, although it was predominantly ORAL. So that is why I want to do a commercial lien, because I ONLY ever invested substantial money and time because the offer on the table BEFORE I invested, was for the purchase via 3 year lease option. The seller ( an active licensed real estate broker) knew she was required to give me a written contract because the lease was for greater than a year, and or, my investment was for greater than $5000.00. My fraudulent landlord-real estate broker, knew this. So I have also alleged fraud. She took me to eviction court on June 30, 2017, and lost! Now she's calling me a "tenant at will" since the judge through out, that made-up 10 months post-possession contract…the jury did not believe her, and they also thought I was insane for doing such a deal without a written contract. Well, in eviction court, there is a very small amount of evidence allowed in, so there was a lot they did not see, which are email, text, and other letters that indicated what this deal was. I also recorded conversations with the seller, out of fear she was about to pull one over on me. I told this to the jury and judge at the eviction court, and he said that I broke the law by recording her. but I looked up the law in California a "two party consent" state however, federal law trumps state, and it says "one party" consent, that being me. I learned all of this after I recorded, and after, the judge told me I broke the law if I recorded without her consent. I just needed to get some leverage and truth documented so in an instant, I just recorded all conversation, and they tell the story of what the deal was. I am a pro se litigant, and I am terrified, looking for help where I can get it, my corrupt landlord makes over $60,000 per month, she owns two group homes, and can afford the most expensive attorney. I am broke and cannot at this time. So I am looking for help where I can get it. I am not trying to be corrupt, just desperate

  • AC Slater

    I read that you can legally remove a lien though by 1.) most obvious paying it off but also 2.) requesting that your lender files a UCC-3. How effective is this typically? Source: http://fitsmallbusiness.com/what-is-a-ucc-filing-lien/#remove

    • pseudolaw.com

      Read carefully.. the lender can be asked to file a UCC-3 to remove the lien after it's paid. This has nothing to do with the paper terrorism mentioned in the article, and you can't use it to get out of a legitimate security agreement and lien without paying (unless the lender happens to voluntarily forgive the debt).

      • Lannette

        May I use this process if someone gave me an oral agreement to sell property for 625,000, then presented me with a purchase offer. After I received the purchase offer, I invested nearly $100,000 in capital improvement change of use from retail to commercial restaurant. The market in the area went up, instead of selling it to me, she tried to evict me stating that i did not pay rent, but lost the case in eviction court on june 30th, 2017. Now she is calling me a "tenant at will", when at the end of the "fixturing period", she agreed to give me a 3-year lease with option to purchase minus the capital improvement investment. Instead (of getting the "carrot") she-the seller (who is also a licensed real estate broker) placed the property on the market for 725,000, 11 months after she gave me the purchase offer. I have filed a civil case on july 31, 2017, but I want to also do this commercial lien, to stop the sell, or if she sells before our case is heard on Dec 13, 2017, I have some leverage to get my money returned plus punitive damages. I am so desperate for justice, this has been a tremendous nightmare, topped off by the fact that I never got the chance to open my storefront.

  • Prisoner 335

    The contract is the Constitution. The signature is on the oath justice department employees take.

    • pseudolaw.com

      The Constitution says the courts are in charge of interpreting the law, so why inject your own theories instead of asking the court to do its job and respecting its authority? If you want the law to change you need to influence the people in your city, county, state, country to participate in public polling, etc. to influence your representatives in the legislature(s).

  • Prisoner 335

    The state uses misapplication of the law as standard procedure. If a citizen tries it they are treated as fools and deadbeats.

    • pseudolaw.com

      If anyone misapplies the law there can be consequences. The courts, pursuant to the state or federal constitution, are in charge of interpreting the law, though, not individuals.